What's so special about YOU?: injecting life back into concepts of gender equality

Gender fatigue, or rather gender apathy seems to be a feature of EU policy at the moment, especially in non-traditional areas such as environment and health. Ludovic Lacaine of the European Men's Health Forum bemoans the fact that the 2.1 billion Euro Public Health Programme 2008-13 does not even mention gender, you can check out his analysis here. The same is true of the European Employment Strategy (EES) where gender concerns have been watered down in favour of 'activation', that is, getting people into work.

One factor is the plethora of groups seeking equality. Inequality has many faces; what marginalises people? Gender, yes, but also where you live: in a forgotten rural community or derelict inner city, your level of education, degree of poverty, disability, age, race, caste, sexual orientation or certain cultural attitudes and practices: so many interlinked dimensions that you suddenly wonder: is gender actually that important? Shouldn't we move beyond it into some kind of more holistic index of inequality, taking into account various factors to determine the barriers faced by a particular individual?  A kind of inequality DNA whose different faulty genes need to be addressed all at the same time?

There is no easy answer. Of course the involvement of men and of those who are more equal than others is indispensible in solving the problem of inequality. But then you have the turkeys campaigning for Christmas problem, or in this case the top dogs: how will it ever be in their interest to let the more marginalised rise to the surface? Perhaps that's what underlies gender blindness in (male-dominated) EU and member states policymaking, a generalised reluctance that beneath its apathy, is all about resistance to actually changing the balance of power in any meaningful way.

I wonder what the best way is to wake up the gender-weary. Whichever way we choose, it's time to set the alarm.